sjm_tfbor
May Conference on Strategic Management

First announcement and call for papers

Environmental and Material Flow Management

First announcement and call for papers
SJM is covered by SCOPUS (http://www.scopus.com)

Since 2006, Published by Technical Faculty in Bor - Serbia. 

Electronic version of this Journal is an Open Accessed source of information  

SJM is covered by EBSCO Publishing (http://www.ebscohost.com)

   
Serbian Journal of Management
2017, vol. 12, iss. 1, pp. 1-27
article language: English 
Original Reseacrh Paper
doi:10.5937/sjm12-9464 
Full text (pdf)
Multi-criteria decision making: an example of sensitivity analysis
Dragan S. Pamučar, Darko Božanić and Aca Ranđelović
University of defence in Belgrade, Military academy, Pavla Jurišića Šturma 33, 11000 Belgrade

e-mail: dpamucar@gmail.com

Abstract

This study provides a model for result consistency evaluation of multicriterial decision making (MDM) methods and selection of the optimal one. The model is based on the analysis of results of MDM methods, that is, the analysis of changes in rankings of MDM methods that occur as a result of alterations in input parameters. In the recommended model, we examine sensitivity analysis of MDM methods to changes in criteria weight and result consistency of methods to changes in measurement scale and the way in which we formulate criteria. In the final phase of the model, we select the most suitable method to solve the observed problem and the optimal alternative. The model is tested on an example, when the optimal MDM method selection was required in order to determine the location of the logistical center. During the selection process, TOPSIS, COPRAS, VIKOR and ELECTRE methods were considered. VIKOR method demonstrated the biggest stability of rankings and was selected as the most fit method for ranking the locations of the logistical center. Results of the demonstrated analysis indicate sensitivity of standard MDM methods to criteria considered in this work. Therefore, it is necessary, to take into account stability of the considered method during the selection process of the optimal method.

CC By link
This Work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Keywords

Multicriterial decision making methods, TOPSIS, COPRAS, VIKOR, ELECTRE

References
Newly uploaded article: references checking, normalizing and linking in progress.
Ahari, R.M., & Niaki, S.T.A. (2014). A hybrid approach based on locally linear neuro-fuzzy modeling and TOPSIS to determine the quality grade of gas well-drilling projects, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 114, 99–106.

Anojkumar, L., Ilangkumaran M., Sasirekha V. (2014). Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for pipe material selection in sugar industry, Expert Systems with Applications 41, 2964–2980.

Awasthi, A., Omrani, H., & Gerber, P. (2013). Multicriteria decision making for sustainability evaluation of urban mobility projects, CEPS/INSTEAD Working Paper No 2013-01, pp. 1-31

Bach, E., & Bridy, A. (2013). On the number of distinct functional graphs of affine-linear transformations over finite fields, Linear Algebra and its Applications, 439, 1312–1320.

Barysiene, J. (2012). A multi-criteria evaluation of container terminal technologies applying the COPRAS-G method. Transport, 27(4), 364–372.

Bottani, E., & Rizzi, A. (2006). A fuzzy TOPSIS methodology to support outsourcing of logistics services, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 11(4), 294–308.

Camparo, J. (2013). A geometrical approach to the ordinal data of Likert scaling and attitude measurements: The density matrix in psychology, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 57, 29–42.

Chang, T.H. (2014). Fuzzy VIKOR method: A case study of the hospital service evaluation in Taiwan, Information Sciences, 271, 196–212.

Chang, C.H., Lin, J.J., Linc, J.H., Chiang, M.C. (2010). Domestic open-end equity mutual fund performance evaluation using extended TOPSIS method with different distance approaches. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(6): 4642-4649.;

Chen S., & Liu, X. (2006). Factors and a Method of Selecting a Site for a Logistical Centre. Journal of Weinan Teachers College, 2, 20-23.

Corrente, S., Figueira, J., & Greco, S. (2014). The SMAA-PROMETHEE method, European Journal of Operational Researsch 239(2), 514–522

French, S. (1988). Decision theory - an introduction to the mathematics of rationality, Chrichster, Ellis Horwood Ltd.

Ghoseiri, K., & Lessan, J. (2008). Location selection for logistic centres using a two-step fuzzy AHP and ELECTE method. Proceedings of the 9th Asia Pasific Industrial Engineering & Management Systems Conference, Indonesia, 434-440.

Kaboli, A., Aryanezhad, M. B., & Shahanaghi, K. (2007). A holistic approach based on MCDM for solving location problems. International Journal of Engineering Transactions A: Basics, 20(3), 252-262.

Kaboli, A., Aryanezhad, M. B., & Shahanaghi, K. (2007). A holistic approach based on MCDM for solving location problems. International Journal of Engineering Transactions A: Basics, 20(3), 252-262.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk, Econometrica, 47(2), pp. 263-292..

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1981). The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice, Science, 211(4481), pp. 453-458.

Kannan, D., Jabbour, A., & Jabbour, C. (2014). Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company, European Journal of Operational Research 233, 432–447.

Kelemenis, A., Askounis, D. (2010). A new TOPSIS-based multi-criteria approach to personnel selection, Expert Systems with Applications 37, 4999–5008.

Kracka, M., Brauers, W. K. M., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2010). Ranking heating losses in a building by applying the MULTIMOORA. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 21(4), 352–359.

Lai, M. C., Sohn, H. S., Tseng, T. L., & Chiang, C. (2010). A hybrid algorithm for capacitated plant location problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 8599–8605.

Li, P., Qian, H., Wu, J., & Chen, J. (2013a). Sensitivity analysis of TOPSIS method in water quality assessment: I. Sensitivity to the parameter weights, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 185, 2453–2461.

Li, P., Qian, H., Wu, J., & Chen, J. (2013b). Sensitivity analysis of TOPSIS method in water quality assessment II: Sensitivity to the index input data, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 185, 2463–2474.

Liu, C.H., Tzeng G.H, & Lee, M.H. (2013). Improving metro–airport connection service for tourism development: Using hybrid MCDM models, Tourism Management Perspectives, 6, 95–107.

Liu, H.C., & Wu, J. (2013). Ping LiAssessment of health-care waste disposal methods using a VIKOR-based fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method, Waste Management, 33, 2744–2751.

Morteza, Y., & Farokh-Payam, A. (2015). A comparative study on material selection of microelectromechanical systems electrostatic actuators using Ashby, VIKOR and TOPSIS, Materials and Design, 65, 328–334.

Mulliner, E., Smallbone, K., & Maliene, V. (2013). An assessment of sustainable housing affordability using a multiple criteria decision making method, Omega 41, 270–279.

Opricović, S., Tzeng, G.H. (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research. 156 (2), 445-455.

Ou, C.-W., & Chou, S.-Y. (2009). International distribution centre selection from a foreign market perspective using a weighted fuzzy factor rating system. Expert System with Applications, 36(2), 1773-1782.

Pamučar, D., & Ćirović G. (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison, Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6), 3016-3028.

Pavličić, D. (1997). Individual preferences and rational choice, Psychology, 1-2, 49-76.

Pavličić, D. (2002). Consistency of multi-attribute analysis method choice, Economic annals, 155, 59-82.

Peng Y., Kou G, Wang G, & Shi Y. (2011). FAMCDM: A fusion approach of MCDM methods to rank multiclass classification algorithms, Omega, 39, 677–689.

Rahmaniani, R., Saidi-Mehrabad, M., & Ashouri, H. (2013). Robust capacitated facility location problem optimization model and solution algorithms. Journal of Uncertain Systems, 7(1), 22–35.

Rahmaniani, R., Saidi-Mehrabad, M., & Ashouri, H. (2013). Robust capacitated facility location problem optimization model and solution algorithms. Journal of Uncertain Systems, 7(1), 22–35.

Rezaeiniya, N., Zolfani, S. H., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2012). Greenhouse locating based on ANP-COPRAS-G methods - an empirical study based on Iran. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 16(2), 188–200.

Rodrigues F. L.J., Osiro, L., & Carpinetti L.C.R. (2014). A comparation between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection Applied Soft Computing, 21, 194–209.

Rogers M, Bruen M. (1998). Choosing realistic values of indifference, preference and veto thresholds for use with environmental criteria within ELECTRE. European Journal of Operational Research, 107:542–51.

Shanian, A., Savadogo O. (2006). TOPSIS multiple-criteria decision support analysis for material selection of metallic bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources, 159(2): 1095-1104.

Stevens-Navarro, E., Martinez-Morales, J.D., & Pineda-Rico, U. (2012). Evaluation of Vertical Handoff Decision Algorightms Based on MADM Methods for Heterogeneous Wireless Networks, Journal of Applied Research and Technology 10, 534–548.

Sun, M. (2012). A tabu search heuristic procedure for the capacitated facility location problem. Journal of Heuristics, 18(1), 91–118.

Triantaphyllou E. (2000): Multi-criteria decision making methods: A comparative study. Kluwer, Dordrecht

Triantaphyllou, E., & Lin, C-T. (1996). Development and evaluation of five fuzzy multiattribute decision-making methods, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 14(4), 281-310.

Triantaphyllou, E., & Mann, S.H. (1989). An Examination of the Effectiveness of Multi-Dimensional Decision-Making Methods: A Decision-Making Paradox, Decision Support Systems 5, 303-312.

Ustinovichius, L., Zavadskas, E. K., & Podvezko, V. (2007). Application of a quantitative multiple criteria decision making (MCDM-1) approach to the analysis of investments in construction. Control and Cybernetics, 36(1): 251–268.

Viteikiene, M., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2007). Evaluating the sustainability of Vilnius city residential areas. Journal of civil engineering and management, 13(2): 149-155.

Wang, S., & Liu, P. (2007). The evaluation study on location selection of logistics centre based on fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS. International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 3779 – 3782.

Wang, X., & Triantaphyllou, E. (2008). Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods. Omega, 36, 45–63.

Wang, Y.L., & Tzeng, G.H. (2012). Brand marketing for creating brand value based on a MCDM model combining DEMATEL with ANP and VIKOR methods, Expert Systems with Applications 39, 5600–5615.

Yang, J.L., Chiu, HN, Tzeng G.H, & Yeh, R.H. (2008). Vendor selection by integrated fuzzy MCDM techniques with independent and interdependent relationships, Information Sciences, 178, 4166–4183.

Yu, O.-Y., Guikema, S.D., Briaud, J.-L., & Burnett, D. (2012). Sensitivity Analysis for Multi-Attribute System Selection Problems in Onshore Environmentally Friendly Drilling (EFD), Systems engineering 15(2), 153–171.

Zare Mehrjerdi, Y., & Nadizadeh, A. (2013). Using greedy clustering method to solve capacitated location-routing problem with fuzzy demands. European Journal of Operational Research, 229(1), 75–84.

Zare Mehrjerdi, Y., & Nadizadeh, A. (2013). Using greedy clustering method to solve capacitated location-routing problem with fuzzy demands. European Journal of Operational Research, 229(1), 75–84.